Problems in the Religion Are Symptoms of Something Deeper

*********** **************** ****************

Contradictions as a Form of Brokenness

First I posted this piece on my campaign Facebook page—a message to the good, decent conservatives. It’s part of my attempt to help bring our conservative neighbors back to the better angels of their nature:

I bet the way you act and feel in your church is a lot more in keeping with the Sermon on the Mount than the way your political leaders encourage you to act and feel.

How much of the peacemaker do your leaders foster in your heart? How much of the merciful? How much do your leaders encourage the spirit of “love thine enemies” and of eschewing contempt (Matthew 5:22)?

If you believe we should be guided by the Sermon on the Mount, are these leaders the kind you should allow yourself to be guided by?

Then one of my readers felt prompted by what I say above to take a swipe at the religion of a good many of the conservative people that I’m addressing. Religion is mostly a problem, as he sees it.

In my response to that reader, I indicated that in my message to the conservatives I’m referring to something quite beautiful in the religion, namely to the spirit that embraces peace and mercy and forgiveness and respect and humility. That is, the spirit of the Sermon on the Mount. He saw my point, but also tried to refocus our attention on religion as problem—the “dogmatically rigid, exclusivist religions that dominate red states.” This led me to respond thus:

Your response brings up some very important points. (They are points that, in my mind, underscore the importance of the “Swinging for the Fences” project.)

Of course, it is possible to find destructive and broken things being expressed in the way any given religion will sometimes be understood and practiced by some of its followers. We would expect religion to be broken in many ways when the world in general has so much brokenness in it. So defects can be found. You call attention to “exclusivist” forms of Christianity in America, a kind of brokenness which could perhaps be characterized (or caricatured) as “We’re in with God, and everyone else is of the Devil.”

In this particular instance — of the church-going Republican supporters who follow one spirit in church and an opposite spirit in the political realm — I am focusing on another kind of brokenness: a tendency to hold contradictions, without noticing or trying to resolve those contradictions. People who are inhabited by fundamentally opposing elements are not of a piece. They’re broken.

There’s something broken, in this case, about someone who goes to church and says he believes in the ethic Jesus teaches in the Sermon on the Mount, and then goes home and is a devotee of Rush Limbaugh the rest of the week, somehow manages not to see the conflict within. The spirit of Limbaugh is about as far from the spirit of the Sermon on the Mount as you can get.

Where does this brokenness come from? Should it be understood in terms of the defects of what’s taught in the church? I think not.

Yes, we can see how the religion expresses itself in broken ways, and how there’s a failure to transmit the spirit of the Sermon on the Mount in such a way that it meaningfully interferes with someone aligning himself with a Rush Limbaugh.

But there’s a deeper level. What’s wrong with the religion is itself, in important ways, the result of a spirit that resides in that culture (or subculture) generally.

The same people who don’t notice any contradiction between the two opposite spirits they embrace can also embrace the contradiction of being a self-declared “patriot” who habitually relates to the U.S. government as the enemy, as if it were an occupying power. And these “patriots” include gun-rights advocates whose main arguments for allowing citizens to own weapons of war is that we citizens need to be prepared to fight the government.

My campaign speeches often went through three such contradictions in today’s Republican Party. “They claim to be conservatives, or patriots, or Christians, but the spirit they’re serving is just the opposite.”

The pattern of self-contradiction –- of lack of integrity, of lying to oneself—is thriving today throughout the political right. “I SAY that I believe in such and such, value such and such; but I ACT as if I am the opposite of what I say.”

The lie is entirely fundamental to this. I tell myself I’m what I should be, but I’m giving expression to what is forbidden.

Such contradiction is a sign of brokenness. And behind this brokenness is a force (a spirit) that fosters brokenness in everything it touches. The problem with these churchgoers — who, in the realm of power, are obeying a spirit the opposite of what their Lord teaches — is but one instance of the larger truth.

It can be demonstrated how that spirit generates brokenness throughout the culture where its reach allows an impact: in the politics, in the power relations among the components of society, in the relationship with the truth, in the way the culture deals with the deep nature and needs of the human being, in the dynamics of the family system, in the subculture’s system of values, in the psychic structure of the human being…
That spirit fosters brokenness –- in people, and in systems —- and then exploits that brokenness to extend its domain.

I call your attention to a discussion in an essay I wrote that I regard as important to the whole understanding I’m developing now in “Swinging for the Fences.” (Recall that there are two main ideas that constitute the “big game” I’m hunting for: 1) The idea that there are forces in the world that can be appropriately called “spirits,” and 2) The idea that in the human drama, one major part of that drama can aptly be described as “the battle between good and evil.”)

In that article I describe the roots of such patterns of contradiction and self-lying. I touch upon the regime of racial oppression in the South during Jim Crow, and upon the assault on the Jews by the Germans under the Nazis. It’s past the halfway point in my article, whose title is “The Concept of Evil.” (The article can be found here on the “Common Dreams” website from back in 2005.)

Here’s the passage from “The Concept of Evil”:

The broken regime of racial persecution in the American South, as Lillian Smith showed in her classic Killers of the Dream built upon the broken psyche of white Southerners brought up with harsh moral strictures that prevented the harmonious integration of natural sexual impulses. The forbidden impulses were then projected out to be rediscovered and punished in the darker race.

In Nazi Germany as Alice Miller showed in For Your Own Good the broken regime of ethnic annihilation built upon the psychic brokenness created by generations of child-rearing practices that legitimated the systematic brutal treatment of children. What was driven underground in the child emerged with a fury against inferior peoples to be destroyed in the name of the noble Fatherland.

In each case, the pattern of brokenness gets spread from the culture to the individual and then back again. The harsh culture, making war against the natural needs and will of the growing human, spreads its pattern of division by preventing the human creature from reconciling or even acknowledging the elements within it.

Print This Post Print This Post
Email This Post Email This Post

7 Responses to “Problems in the Religion Are Symptoms of Something Deeper”

  1. David R Says:

    When the host has finished with this thread I would be willing to offer a sum-up from the perspective of one who has been observing all this for maybe ten years longer-maybe even from ‘childhood’- now much closer to eighty years of age. Just a couple of brief but significant thoughts and then no more ’til a sum-up we may offer.

    First: the case of mixed motives which is so common among mankind does not constitute brokenness.(and hypocrisy only if the motives are denied).

    Second: The Sermon on the Mount speaks to the heart. Jesus teachings here do not yet address the problem of ‘adapting’ human nature to be able to live by the ideals . . summed up briefly by the 1st commandment “Thou shalt love the Lord thy Gdd with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy mind and with all thy strength” and then the 2nd is more likely possible :”Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself” The true Christian religion (FAITH) had yet to be developed and the bestowing on true believers of The Holy Spirit.

    So, taking a broder view, we can see one who does not even believe this God even exists or certainly not The God of this same Bible where we find this Sermon on the Mount, one wonders with what credentials or from what base the host goes about to instruct all the “broken”.

    It is early yet and the sun is shining so I am out to experience the ‘temple’ of nature as R Randall so well speaks of on a previous thread.

  2. Andrew Bard Schmookler Says:

    If there is a reason why one must be a believer in Christian theology in order to be able to perceive the spirit behind Jesus’s teaching of “Love thy neighbor as thyself” and to perceive also how opposite of that is the spirit of vituperation and false witness and rage embodied in Rush Limbaugh and the other spokesmen of today’s political right, I am not aware of it.

    (I should add, David R., that if your comment above gave such a reason, I did not understand it.)

  3. Andrew Bard Schmookler Says:

    A friend of mine, in a private email, wrote this which I thought worth sharing here, and do so with his permission. He’d written me about people of his denomination who embodied this kind of contradiction. I asked if he’d made any effort to deal with these people about that contradiction. And he wrote: “I’ve tried with a couple of people, pointing out the contradiction. Both times, it met with zero response. They can’t seem to grasp the inconsistency. I find it completely inexplicable. In the end, I guess people’s cultural conditioning and socio-ecoonmic status seem to trump their religious beliefs when it comes to making judgement on politics. I suppose, dear friend, that it’s like using Scripture to justify slavery in the antebellum South. We force our religious beliefs to conform to our economic needs, instead of conforming our lives to our religious beliefs.”

  4. Kassandra Kersting Says:

    In my life I found denial such a power that indeed I had no idea that one, I was a very angry person. If someone confronted me with that there was a state of profound confusion on my part and denial of my anger. There was so much interior guilt, from parents, church and society that I could not allow myself to see what it was that I was doing. More guilt does not seem to be the solution. Yet a deep desire to be a good person eventually led me out of my darkness and utter confusion of the facts and a life I now love living. There are processes to get beyond ones anger and rage………..but one has to be aware and willing.

  5. Andrew Bard Schmookler Says:

    Thank you for your comment, Kassandra. I wonder if you can expand on it a bit. One question: you say that more guilt does not seem to be the solution, but what was the solution. You speak of “a deep desire to be a good person,” but it is not clear how that would overcome the barriers of denial and create the awareness that had been lacking before.

    Another question: do you think your understanding of your experience provides any insight into how those on the right who are now in denial can be led into greater awareness?

  6. Kassandra Kersting Says:

    It would be wonderful if I could come up with a perfect solution. Our world needs that so much now. My comment was in a sense to convey how surprisingly powerful denial is…………..and the cause of denial internal guilt. What motivates persons to seek a new level of understanding is usually their own misery.

    However, if the morality was not within them, there would be no need for denial. Perhaps reminding christians of the Sermon could be useful so long as it is done in a non judgemental way.

  7. Robin Pettit Says:

    Denial is indeed a powerful emotion and mental trick. The more one invests in a wrong position, the harder it is to break through the denial. It is true Kassandra what you speak, you do need to have a deep desire to be good and be willing to be aware and willing to want to lead a better life than what denial did to you.

    Morality is both fixed and fungible. Killing, slavery, lying, stealing are all bad as it is someone denying someone something of theirs that is either precious or of value. Other parts of morality can be less set such as sexual orientation, smoking pot and driving gas guzzling SUVs. Both lists are far from complete but I am glad both your drive for good and a sense of morality led you out of denial. I hope I am not in denial. I assume I would have a sense. The Sermon on the Mount is a very good story in the Bible.

    To help understand the brokeness of the Churches in the “Red States”, there is a long set of writings on this subject by the “Angry Brad” or Brad Hicks on his Livejournal pages. The direct link is somewhere far down on one of the comment threads in the blog section of this website. Whether you believe what he says or not, he probably did get some viewpoint from one church that is part of the brokeness of the Christian Religion in this country.

    Regardless, Peace be with you, and a well life as well.

Leave a Reply

Please enter an answer in the box above before submitting your comment - this helps prevent SPAM. Thank you.